Rivalry at Work and Anti-Rivalry

Rivalry at Work

“The more we compete, the less we gain”
Peter Thiel, Zero to One

Everyone should mind her own business! How dare you interfere in my business? We need to watch out for the other team! We are good as we are! I am not indulging with your business, so no one should indulge with mine!

Such and similar phrases are usually avoided to be voiced, still heard at workplace here and there, and they reveal rivalry and defensiveness.

When you care about these words and listen to what is being told, -which are usually served with an accompanying throughout stories from recent past- in case you are not careful, you might suddenly start to see yourself as taking a side. In these stories, everyone is right; whichever side you listen to, that side seems to be right. You either have to choose your side or stay with “who cares” mentality, which basically means “listening” to both sides yet you not minding much about either side.

However, if you pay attention, you will start to feel an absurdity. Yes, only if you pay attention and it will not be automatic, you will need to stop and look, and ask, what does this story really tells me? What’s this defense about? Is another story really not possible? If the sides of this rivalry are people or teams under your management, than paying attention is a must for you. You must realize and you must ask yourself “what’s really going on?”

Defense is described as “capability of resisting attack” (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). Definition itself is pointing out a very interesting absurdity; who is attacking? You are defending, so there has to be an attack, right? So, in this case your work-fellow (!) is the attacker!

Well, why is this defensive status, this rivalry happening? We might try try to find answers by looking at one or more of the following.

First of all, if there is defense there is also fear of losing. I have to defend, attack or run away for not losing because if there is perception of an attack, everything in the brain stops. Let’s repeat, stops, your brain stops, it does not work! Excuse me, let me correct, everything stops but amygdala. Everything else in the brain give way to the great amygdala (indeed its size and its shape is similar to an almond, and actually it means almond in Greek) and amygdala is all alone in the battlefield. However, amygdala to which we own our thousands of years of existence, does only know two things, fight or flight! (hmm, can we say fight or resign when the battlefield is our workplace?)

Secondly, there is the feeling of insecurity. I’m not trusting that my fellow, the other team will fight fairly. I am consciously using the word “fight”, consciously because if we talk about insecurity, perceptually there should also be a fight. My fellow colleague, the other team is my rival. My colleague is not someone that I create, I co-create with, and the team I’m competing with is not my collaborator towards a bigger purpose.

Thirdly, I’m not yet aware of the benefits of co-working and and not even concentrating at my own work instead of rivalry. There is no answer to the question of “what’s in it for me?”. Or, just a second, not the answer, even the question itself does not exist. Does not exist, because I don’t have time, I don’t have energy. My time and energy are spent on the fight; even if I do like to spare some energy nothing is left on my reserves, I’m busy in a sense. Maybe, I do like to act like this, because messing around with others tastes like french fries, you can’t resist, you salt, you dip into ketchup, mustard whatever you like and you keep eating. And, I’m acting childishly, my mother (or father) cooked wonderful dishes, the dinner table looks great, and I’m stubbornly and only eating french fries. All I care! I’m not working with you, I’m not playing with you, I’m not creating…

Fourth, I’m not aware of this: you need to love your colleagues. Months ago, thinking about workplace, I was describing it like this; the demand and expectation around us becoming so extreme and we need a true and diverse support (including emotions) from our colleagues, which is not happening without love. Otherwise, results are very usual, far from being great.


First of all, ask yourself; what’s this defense all about for God’s sake? What will happen if you don’t defend and refuse to fight? Do you really want your amygdala to manage you? Have you asked? Have you really asked these questions? If yes, you do not need me for the answers, if no, go back to the beginning of this paragraph.

Secondly, stop fighting. Simply dismiss it, drop it. Fight draws you to the bottom, fight is weights you are holding that draws you. Drop it. Drop and rise. Similarly, ‘distrust’ also draws relationships, draws any progress to the bottom. Sucks energy. Which is more preferable to be drawn with distrust and struggle or to stay stable at surface and swim through trust? For a second, let’s assume that the attack continues from the other side (whoever they are), your head is being submerged into the water, your head remains under the water for a while, you struggle and you are up again. Instead of counterattack, what happens if you continue swimming and leave the wrangler behind where he is? Which one do you prefer, fighting childishly and endlessly where you are or progress? Go on and choose one of them!

Thirdly, focusing at your work, becoming better and deeper at what you do will mean that you do increase your uniqueness, your wisdom and insights about it. We’ve just started to swim, now it’s time to catch a flow and start flowing. That will result in arriving earlier where you do intend to arrive. You will be seen astonishingly strong and smooth and as the flow you catch will remain invisible to other eyes. Once you catch this flow, you will also start to realise beauties around the river, you will enjoy and you will have the chance to benefit from those. Still, it is your call if you want keep saying “all I care” and keep eating french fries only. The choice is yours, the choice was always yours, the choice is always yours.

Fourth, just love, what’s the big deal about it? “Loving, everything begins by loving somebody” said Sait Faik, in one of this short stories. Work life is very challenging as it is anyways, how long can it be sustained without love and positiveness? Isn’t it preferable to have hours full of affection and possibilities rather hatred and anger which only bring deadlocks?

In case you are in a leading position, “what to do?” should answer a double meaning for you. First, follow the steps yourself. Second, use all the leadership techniques you know and encourage these steps in your team and in every member of your team.

As a later topic to write about, it’s also possible to define bigger hoops when you look at this rivalry-defense-attack triangle from a bigger perspective. Take the companies in the same industry performing rivalry-defense-attack against each other; could it be resulting in similar harms as in a single organisation, bringing stagnation, hindering progress for the whole industry which inevitably will mean stagnation and inhibition of progress for every single player in the industry? If we like to see even a bigger hoop, can we look at national economies? (Surely if such a thing called national economy still exists against economies of multinational companies). It seems -even though we have some countries who think and play as they are defending against some attacks, positioning themselves as defenders and keeping a rivalry from a nationalist point of view- today, the main players in the world are some companies and few countries -like Singapore- which are focusing at their own progress and advancement. They are not rivaling, quoting Peter Thiel once more, they are not considering competition as a sign of value but as a destructive force.


Curiosity as antidote of anger. Öfkenin panzehiri olarak merak.

“You can’t be angry and curious at the same time.” Since I’ve heard of it from Seth Godin who credits Catherine Hoke and who credits her friend Dan Tocchini, I cannot stop thinking about it.

Anger, (visualize a moment when your anger captivates you, for example while driving), is a feeling that freezes the moment for the person, and freezes the potential possible actions that might be taken. It’s a feeling that triggers a very simplistic way of thinking in the brain, triggers aggression and/or yet another captivating feeling of unfairness or some other reactions and/or feelings that I cannot name right now. I can surely say, however, that any feeling triggered by anger will chain you to the present time which of course will turn itself into a past in a blink of an eye time. You will be hooked into this negative experience, it will turn into a vicious circle and will repeat itself throughout the similar encounters you are going to face. It is a poisonous situation unless you are enjoying it!

Since I’ve heard the sentence, I’m still amazed with the simplicity of the antidote of anger. Curiosity! Probably it is not going to serve as a tool for problem resolution. Maybe it might not even have a visible and immediate effect helping in elimination of the problem causing anger. Yet, it saves you from being hooked into a vicious circle, stops the poison, and keeps you remain in your own flow, in present and towards to your future. By being curious, you start asking questions, and life is very generous in answering them; you ask, and the answers find you. The answers help you understand, and might bring some solutions eventually. At least, it makes plus one person, you, who understands the cause and accumulates for a future tipping point when the source of anger can be resolved.

Hoke’s book is already listed to be read and just discovered a podcast interview with her, by Tim Ferriss, to be listened. Maybe, when I dig further, I will discover that currently I am misinterpreting the saying. If that’s the case, I’ll write another post. For the time being, make the choice, and, hopefully, stay curios.

“Aynı anda hem öfkeli hem de meraklı olamazsın.” Duyduğumdan bu yana, hakkında düşünmeden edemediğim bir cümle. Seth Godin’den duydum, ki o Catherine Hoke’u referans veriyor, o ise bir konuşmasında arkadaşı Dan Tocchini’yi referans veriyor.

Öfke, (öfkenin sizi esir aldığı bir anı gözünüzde canlandırın, mesela araba kullanırken), bir yandan kişi için anı dondururken, bir yandan da alınabilecek olası aksiyonları dondurur. Beynin kapasitesinin çok altında bir düşünme şekliyle çalışmasına sebep olur, saldırganlığın ve/veya haksızlık yapıldığı duygusunun, veya şimdi sayamadığım benzer başka esir alıcı duygu veya reaksiyonların tetiklenmesine sebep olur. Olası tüm duyguları saymak mümkün olmasa da, şunu söylemek mümkün, öfkenin ortaya çıkarabileceği duygu sizi mevcut zamana zincirler, ki göz açıp kapayıncaya kadar mevcut zaman geçmiş zaman haline gelir. Bu negatif deneyime bağlı hale gelirsiniz, benzer durumlarla karşılaştıkça kısır döngü gibi kendisini tekrar eder. Zehirleyen, ve özel bir zevkiniz yoksa kaçınmak isteyeceğiniz bir durum.

Başlangıçta yazdığım cümleyi duyduğumdan bu yana, öfkenin panzehirinin basitliğine hayret ediyorum. Merak! Muhtemelen, problemin çözüm aracı olmayacaktır. Belki de, öfkeye neden olan problemin giderilmesi konusunda görünür ve hızlı bir etkisi de olmayacaktır. Ancak, sizi kısır döngüye saplanmaktan kurtarabilir, zehri durdurabilir, ve kendi akışınızda, bugününüzde -ve geleceğinize doğru- kalmanıza yardımcı olabilir.  Meraklı olarak, soru sormaya başlarsınız, ve hayat cevaplar verme konusunda cömert davranır; siz sorarsınız ve cevaplar sizi bulur. Cevaplar anlamanıza yardımcı olur, ve hatta zaman içinde çözümleri de getirebilir. En azından, artı bir kişi olursunuz; sebebi anlamaya başlayan ve gelecekte öfkeye sebep olan şeyin çözüleceği kıvılcım anı için biriktiren artı bir kişi.

Hoke’un kitabı okunacaklar, kendisiyle yapılmış uzunca bir mülakat dinlenecekler listesinde. Belki bu konuyu biraz daha didiklediğimde, söylenmek istenen şeyi yanlış yorumladığımı anlayacağım. O durumda başka bir yazı daha yazmam gerekecek elbet. Şimdilik şunu söyleyebilirim, tercihinizi yapın, ve mümkünse meraklı olmayı seçin.